I disagree, as you say, "Conservatives spent the better part of a decade watching statues toppled and storefronts smashed by people who were certain their cause justified the damage." And no one suffered the consequences of this destruction. Ergo his action is just free speech. This man had every right to his free speech too.
No, he did not. The author explained why, and you would also know, had you read the article. Free speech does NOT include vandalism, Poag. You might consider reading the USC as well.
I will die for Jesus Christ. Jesus is Lord
Painting over the sign is the quick, easy, cheap, and lazy way of responding to this heresy.
I get the impulse to simply erase an outrageous claim, but those who rented signs with the actual truth about Jesus did it right.
I disagree, as you say, "Conservatives spent the better part of a decade watching statues toppled and storefronts smashed by people who were certain their cause justified the damage." And no one suffered the consequences of this destruction. Ergo his action is just free speech. This man had every right to his free speech too.
No, he did not. The author explained why, and you would also know, had you read the article. Free speech does NOT include vandalism, Poag. You might consider reading the USC as well.
I fear you missed the intended sarcasm.