A goat-headed figure with horns, wings, and a human body sits on store shelves as a soft, huggable plush. Kids see an adorable stuffed animal. Christian parents should see what the symbol actually is.

Baphomet did not begin as a cartoon character. The image took shape in nineteenth-century occult circles and was later claimed by Satanic groups. Christianity.com reports that companies like Squishable now sell soft versions with playful copy that treats the figure as a chill companion for tea and heavy metal. The packaging is cute. The history is not.

Making something soft does not rewrite its meaning. Making it funny does not make it spiritually neutral. A child lacks the categories to know the difference. That is why parents exist.

Subscribe now

When Darkness Arrives as Entertainment

The plush toy is only one example of a larger pattern. Ideas Scripture calls detestable have been rebranded as harmless fun.

Astrology is the clearest case. Horoscopes appear in magazines, social feeds, and casual conversation. “What’s your sign?” no longer raises an eyebrow. A 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that 28 percent of American adults consult astrology or a horoscope at least once a year, and 30 percent consult astrology, tarot cards, or a fortune teller on that same schedule. Most call it entertainment. Scripture does not grant that exemption.

The Ouija board followed the same path. It left the Spiritualist parlor and entered the game aisle. Its premise remains an attempt to contact spirits.

Deuteronomy 18:10-12 is blunt: “There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD.”

Leviticus 19:31 adds the same warning against mediums and spiritists. The issue is not cultural taste. It is spiritual allegiance. God alone supplies wisdom, guidance, and truth. Turning elsewhere breaks that bond.

What a Clean Break Looks Like

The New Testament does not soften the line. Paul told the Corinthians that pagan sacrifices are offered to demons and that believers cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. Ephesus was thick with sorcery. When the gospel took root, those who had practiced magic brought their scrolls and burned them in public. The value of the books was fifty thousand drachmas—a fortune. They did not keep a few as curiosities. They made a clean break because they knew what the scrolls represented.

Saul shows the opposite path. He had driven mediums out of Israel. He knew the command. When the Philistines pressed him and the Lord gave no answer, he disguised himself, traveled by night, and consulted the medium at Endor.

First Chronicles 10:13-14 records the verdict without apology: Saul died because he was unfaithful to the Lord, did not keep His word, and consulted a medium rather than inquiring of God. Each earlier compromise had made the next one easier.

What we laugh at we learn to tolerate. What we tolerate we learn to accept. What we accept we eventually practice. Culture is comfortable with darkness dressed as fun. Families must be clearer than the culture.

Teaching Discernment Without Fear

Biblical illiteracy makes the work harder. Hosea 4:6 still applies: people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Children are drawn to color, story, and novelty. Their innocence is not the problem. The problem is parents who have never trained them to test what they see against Scripture.

Hebrews 5:14 says the mature have trained themselves by constant use to distinguish good from evil. That training does not come from one viral warning or a single ban. It comes from sustained time in the Word. Romans 12:2 calls believers to refuse the world’s pattern and be transformed by the renewing of the mind. Satan still masquerades as an angel of light. The counterfeit looks appealing precisely because it is designed to.

CBN has long urged parents to engage culture with their children rather than leave them to interpret it alone, always measuring against the absolute standard of Scripture. The practical test is simple. Does the item or story promote practices Scripture forbids—divination, spell-casting, contact with spirits, or seeking guidance apart from God? Imaginative storytelling is one thing. An invitation to those practices is another. A plush modeled on a Satanic emblem fails that test no matter how soft it is.

When something fails, remove it and tell the child why. Explain the biblical boundary. Answer the questions. Investigate unfamiliar symbols together instead of reacting to appearance alone. Model the same standard in your own choices. Make God’s Word the regular reference point of family life, not an occasional emergency tool.

The greatest protection is not exhaustive knowledge of every occult symbol. It is deep knowledge of the truth that exposes the counterfeit. Parents who know the difference can teach their children to see it too—even when the darkness arrives looking cute.

Plenty of Christians over the centuries have assumed the serpent went after Eve because she was the weaker vessel, more emotional, or simply easier to fool. That reading has been popular in sermons and commentaries alike. The text does not support it. Eve was made as Adam’s equal, his ezer kenegdo—a strong counterpart formed face to face with him, not a lesser assistant. The same word is used elsewhere of God Himself as the helper of His people.

She was no soft target.

Subscribe now

The serpent’s choice was tactical. God had given the prohibition directly to Adam in Genesis 2:16-17, before Eve was even formed. The primary target was always Adam. He was the one whose disobedience would implicate the race. But Adam had heard the words straight from God’s mouth. There was little chance of talking him out of a command he had received firsthand. So the serpent went around him to the one whose knowledge of the rule was secondhand.

“Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?” The question is aimed first and foremost at God—casting doubt on His goodness, His generosity, and whether He could be trusted. It plants the idea that God is holding something back. At the same time it probes the reliability of the relay. Could she trust Adam?

Eve’s answer reveals the crack. She correctly notes that they may eat of the other trees, but then adds “neither shall ye touch it,” a restriction nowhere in the original command. Jewish tradition long ago noted that someone—Adam in the telling, or Eve in the hearing—had added a protective fence. The serpent exploited it.

Once she ate and did not immediately drop dead, her experience carried weight. As his equal she could speak from what she had just seen and tasted. Adam hearkened to the voice of his wife. That is the charge God levels against him: not that the serpent deceived him, but that he listened to her.

Some still claim Adam stood right there the whole time, silent while the serpent spoke. The conversation itself undercuts that. When God confronts Adam, he does not say the serpent beguiled him or that he heard the snake’s words. He points to the woman: “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.”

Eve is the one who names the serpent. Adam was not deceived by the creature’s talk. He chose to follow her after she had already eaten. As Paul later puts it, “Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”

The serpent knew the difference between a command received from God and one received through another person. He attacked the link he could bend, then used that link to reach the man who could not be bent the same way. That is the real reason he went after Eve.

Matthew 5:39 does not command passivity. It commands a refusal to play the other man’s game. “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” The Greek word rendered “resist” is antistenai. It means to stand against in the same manner, to answer force with matching force, to mirror the attacker’s method. Jesus is forbidding retaliation in kind, not forbidding resistance itself.

The cultural detail makes it clearer. In the world of first-century Judea a slap to the right cheek was almost always a backhanded blow. Right-handed men used the back of the hand to mark an inferior: master to slave, Roman to Jew, superior to lesser. Equals got a closed fist. Turning the other cheek forced the striker into a dilemma. Hit again with the unclean left hand, or strike with the open palm as an equal. Either way the insult lost its power. The victim refused the assigned role of the beaten-down inferior and asserted dignity without returning the blow. That is not submission. It is active, non-retaliatory resistance.

Subscribe now

Jesus demonstrated the difference. He drove the money changers from the temple with a whip. He called Pharisees whitewashed tombs and a brood of vipers. He walked through a murderous crowd in Nazareth rather than submit to their plan. Yet when He was struck before Annas He answered with a question about lawful process, not a counter-strike. On the cross He did not call down fire. He prayed for forgiveness. “Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously.”

The pattern is consistent: refuse personal revenge, refuse to become the evil you oppose, and still refuse to be defined or destroyed by it.

Scripture never collapses this into total non-resistance. Romans 13 assigns the sword to the civil magistrate. Luke 22:36 records Jesus telling the disciples to buy a sword. Self-defense of life and family is not personal vengeance. Reporting a crime is not revenge. Protecting the weak is not a violation of Matthew 5. What the text forbids is the private settling of scores, the nursing of grudges, the cycle that turns the injured party into a mirror of the injurer. “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.”

That distinction matters more now than it did in the first century. A culture that mocks faith, family, and biological reality loves to quote the cheek verse at Christians while never applying it to itself. The demand is always one-way: yield another inch, accommodate another inversion, stay silent while institutions are captured. Calling that “turning the other cheek” is a misuse. Forgiveness of personal insult is one thing. Handing over the next generation’s inheritance to people who treat mercy as weakness is something else entirely.

The same Lord who said turn the other cheek also said the gates of hell would not prevail against His church. One is about personal posture toward insult. The other is about the church’s posture toward darkness. Confusing the two produces either doormats or hypocrites. Neither is faithful. The real demand is harder: refuse the revenge that would make you like the enemy, and still stand so that the enemy cannot pretend you have surrendered. Dignity is not passivity. Truth-telling is not retaliation. Both are required.

Bethany Miller is not warning about some future problem. She is describing the one already sitting in your pocket.

The communications director for the National Religious Broadcasters told Faithwire and CBN News that believers are walking into an information war with the habits of people who still think the news comes from a desk at 6 p.m. It does not. Social media is how young and old alike get their headlines now. Reels. Clips. A stranger with a ring light and a confident voice. Then artificial intelligence on top of that, manufacturing footage that looks real enough to fool a generation that never learned the difference.

New media is something we shouldn’t be afraid of. We need to stay ahead of the curve and realize new media is the way. Social media is how we get our headlines.

That part is true. Fear of the tool is a lazy excuse. The tool is already the public square. Pretending otherwise does not keep your kids out of it. It just means somebody else catechizes them there.

Subscribe now

A Generation With No Wall Between the Screen and the Street

Miller’s sharper point is about Generation Z and teenagers. They are growing up with no separation between the digital world and the physical one. Information lands, and the first question is no longer whether it happened. The first question is whether it feels true.

Today’s Gen Z’s and teenagers are growing up without any form of separation between the digital and the physical. And so information is being consumed and then the tricky part is now we’re having the question of what is real and what is not real.

That is not a parenting lecture. That is a description of the battlefield. Inaccurate headlines. Everybody’s opinion, delivered at the same volume as a fact. Truth and untruth stacked in the same scroll until the eye stops trying to sort them. Miller said Gen Z has not grown up with any distance between reality and what is not reality, and she does not think they have the discernment to ask whether a clip is true, whether it is biblical, or whether it is true, good, and beautiful.

Scripture already named this problem. “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” The false prophets used to need a pulpit or a printing press. Now they need a prompt and a thumbnail.

Random video is not testimony. An AI voice reading a Bible verse in a dead pastor’s cadence is not a word from the Lord. A thirty-second clip of a war, cropped to flatter one side, is not the war. Miller said the assumption that those things are authentic is already producing a pile of confusion, and she is right. The American public is drinking from a firehose of headlines and calling the spray news.

The Stories the Feed Buries

This is where the argument stops being about media literacy and starts being about souls and nations.

Miller pointed at two examples that ought to embarrass every newsroom still pretending it covers the world evenly. Persecution of Christians in Nigeria barely registers. After Hamas slaughtered Israelis on October 7, Israel was the one put on trial in a thousand clips. The bodies were real. The framing was a choice.

Fox News has already carried the Nigeria numbers that polite television prefers to skip. Bill Maher, of all people, said Islamists have killed more than 100,000 Christians there since 2009 and burned some 18,000 churches, and that more Christians are killed for their faith in Nigeria than in the rest of the world combined. Open Doors has said the same thing for years. The feed did not. A generation that gets its headlines from Reels can recite Gaza talking points and cannot find Plateau State on a map.

That is information warfare. Not a metaphor. A selection. What gets thirty seconds of outrage, and what gets silence, trains the conscience. If the church is not in that fight, the silence wins by default.

The Great Commission Did Not Stop at the Shore

Miller’s answer is not retreat. Christian media, she said, is finally getting better across social platforms, film, and television. There is still a long way to go. Creators have to know the audience. Thirty seconds is what performs on Instagram. Format is not compromise if the truth survives the cut. It is competence.

We know that Christian media has the answer, we have truth, we are the only ones that are providing the way to eternity.

That last line will irritate people who want faith kept in a private drawer. Good. The way to eternity is not a brand position. It is the claim. If it is true, then a feed full of half-true war clips and synthetic sermons is not a hobby. It is a mission field.

When we talk about the Great Commission, that doesn’t just mean going over across seas to Africa. It also means getting online because the mission field is also media. It is also digital.

And then the line that should end the argument about whether believers belong there at all.

The digital world is a spiritual world as well and Christians need to be there combating, and we need to be there leading the front lines, and we need to be there getting the truth.

Leading is not reposting. Leading is telling the Nigeria story when the algorithm will not. It is refusing to let October 7 be rewritten by the loudest editor on the app. It is teaching a teenager to ask who made the clip, what it cut out, and whether it agrees with the Word before it agrees with the vibe.

New media is not the enemy. A church that fears the tool and abandons the field is. The war is already on. The only open question is whether the people who have the truth plan to show up.

Richard Dawkins has spent decades telling the world that God would never have built an eye this way. The photocells point the wrong direction. The wiring sits in front of the light. There is a blind spot punched through the retina. Any tidy-minded engineer, he said, would laugh and send the whole thing back.

Then the engineers kept looking. And the laugh landed on him.

Dr Jonathan Corrado walks through the anatomy again in a Creation Ministries piece first printed in 2023 and updated this month. The human eye is not a lucky camera. It is roughly forty interlocking subsystems — iris, pupil, cornea, lens, retina, optic nerve, and the rest — doing work no smartphone sensor can match. It reads contrast and faint detail at the same time. It discerns about ten million colors. Photoreceptors fire electric pulses into the optic nerve, and the visual cortex, with help from processing already happening in the retina itself, handles up to 1.5 million pulse messages per millisecond.

He that planted the ear, shall he not hear? he that formed the eye, shall he not see?

Subscribe now

Ninety Million Rods and a Forest That Turns Out to Be Fiber Optic

The retina is the film. About ninety million rod cells handle low light in black and white. Six to seven million cone cells, packed near the macula, handle color in bright light. Three cone types divide the visible spectrum: long-wavelength for red, medium for green, short for blue.

That is the part Dawkins never bothered to finish. In The Blind Watchmaker he complained that light has to pass through “a forest of connecting wires, presumably suffering at least some attenuation and distortion.” Evolutionists still call the vertebrate retina inverted and treat the squid’s “verted” layout as the sensible alternative. No wiring in front of the sensors. No blind spot. Therefore, they say, no Designer.

Light, instead of being granted an unrestricted passage to the photocells, has to pass through a forest of connecting wires, presumably suffering at least some attenuation and distortion.

The forest includes living optical fibers. Müller glial cells span the thickness of the retina. Funnel-shaped endfeet collect light at the inner surface and guide it to the photoreceptors on the far side with low scatter and low loss. One Müller cell serves each cone. Several rods can share one. Researchers at Leipzig and later at the Technion in Haifa showed the array behaves like a fiber-optic plate. It sharpens the image. It helps sort wavelengths so red and green light reach the cones that need them. Night vision barely pays a tax.

The “wires” Dawkins mocked are not a traffic jam. Horizontal cells form a feedback loop that boosts contrast and sharpens edges without flattening the shadows. The blind spot exists on paper. Two eyes and a brain that fills the gap mean you do not live inside it.

Flip the Wiring and You Go Blind

The inverted layout is not a leftover accident. Photoreceptors sit against the retinal pigment epithelium so worn-out discs can be cleared and visual pigment can be resupplied. That tissue is opaque. So is the blood-rich layer that feeds cells with a ferocious metabolic burn and pulls off excess heat. Put those layers in front of the sensors — the arrangement Dawkins treats as obviously superior — and you are asking the eye to look through two black curtains.

Ophthalmologist Peter Gurney laid that out years before the Müller-cell papers made the headlines. Invert the retina the “correct” way and the light never arrives. Keep it as built and the receptors get fuel, cooling, and a fiber-optic feed. That is not a compromise. That is a specification.

Hawks and eagles use the same alleged blunder. Their acuity is about eight times ours. They spot prey from heights that would leave a human squinting. Nobody calls a hawk poorly designed. The squid, poster child for the “right” wiring, simply does not see as well. If the inverted retina were a defect, the animals that hunt by sight would have abandoned it. They did not.

The Argument From Insult

Bad-design rhetoric is not an observation. It is a sermon. The preacher assumes he already knows what a competent Engineer would have drawn on the first pass, then treats every unexpected layer as proof there was no Engineer. When the unexpected layer turns out to be a light guide tuned to the colors we actually use, the sermon does not get rewritten. It just gets louder.

Corrado’s point is simpler than the footnote war. Optimization means making a system as effective as possible for the world it inhabits. The human eye is maximized for life under this sun, in this atmosphere, with this brain. It would fail in another environment, which is exactly what you expect from a purpose-built instrument and not from a lucky kludge assembled by mutation and time.

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

Forty subsystems. Fiber optics grown in living tissue. A pigment layer that would black out the alternative design. A hawk that uses the same “mistake” to stoop on a rabbit. Dawkins asked for an engineer. He got one. He just refused to look through the eye God already gave him.

The modern church has a new test for love. If you cannot be destabilized, you do not care. If you cannot be emotionally hijacked, you are cold. If your inner weather does not rise and fall with the people around you, you are a monster.

Then they take that test and hang it on the Almighty.

That is the quiet heresy running through a century of Western theology. Jürgen Moltmann’s “crucified God,” Open Theism, and the soft therapeutic evangelicalism that talks as if God’s heart is a mood ring have all sold the same product. They want a deity who weeps on cue, suffers with the age, and gets wounded by history. They call it compassion. It is an attempt to put the Creator on a couch.

A Reformed Arsenal essay on divine impassibility puts the knife in the right place. A god who can be altered by his creatures is a god held hostage by his world. If grief can surge through Him without His consent, if a tragedy can change His inner state, if human rebellion can force Him from joy into sorrow, then He is not the Rock. He is just a larger version of us.

Subscribe now

Passion Does Not Mean What Your Worship Leader Thinks

In the language of the old dogmatics, “passion” is not romance. It comes from the Latin for suffering, for being acted upon. A passion is an involuntary change caused from the outside. You see a wreck. Grief hits you. You did not choose the new weather in your chest. Something external moved you from one state to another.

That is exactly what the Westminster Confession denies of God. He is “without body, parts, or passions.” Not because He is ice. Because He cannot be the passive object of the universe He made.

Impassibility is not a lonely extra doctrine. It follows from what God already is. If He is simple, He has no unused corners waiting to be filled by creaturely events. If He is a se, He does not borrow His blessedness from our obedience or our collapse. If He is pure act, He does not lurch from potential to actuality every time the news cycle turns. A God who “starts grieving” has just admitted He was incomplete a moment ago.

Herman Bavinck saw the pastoral cost. Predicate change of God’s essence, knowledge, or will and you shrink every other attribute with it. Independence, simplicity, eternity, omniscience, omnipotence. You do not get a warmer Father. You get a smaller one. And religion loses the one thing suffering people actually need, a foundation that does not move when they do.

The Bible Is Not Giving God a Personality Profile

The usual proof texts get waved like a gotcha. Genesis 6, the Lord regretted that He made man. Hosea 11, His heart recoils, His compassion grows warm. Fine. Those verses are in the Book. So are the verses that refuse to let you read them like a diary.

God is not a man that He should lie or repent. The Glory of Israel will not lie or have regret. “I the Lord do not change; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.” James says every good gift comes from the Father of lights, “with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.”

Scripture uses human body language for God. Hands. Eyes. Wings. Nobody with a functioning mind thinks the Father grew feathers. It also uses human feeling language. That is anthropopathism, not a press conference from heaven’s therapist. When Genesis says God regretted making man, it is not reporting that the eternal mind just discovered a design flaw. It is putting holy justice against human filth into words a creature can bear.

Bavinck’s picture still works. A ship turns from north to south. The same wind that once filled the sails now slams the bow. The wind did not change. The ship did. When a people apostatize, they meet the same holy God as wrath instead of blessing. The motion is in the creature. Not in the Creator.

That is also why wrath is not an Old Testament mood swing that Jesus later outgrew. As Harbinger’s Daily has insisted, the Lord who does not change is both mercy and judgment. Soft pastors who keep only the gentle half are not being kind. They are editing God.

He only is my rock and my salvation. He is my defence. I shall not be moved.

The Cross Did Not Put a Crack in the Trinity

The loudest objection is Calvary. If the Son suffered, they say, then God suffered. Moltmann made a career of that move after Auschwitz. Only a suffering God can help. It sounds brave. It is sloppy Christology dressed up as pastoral courage.

The church already fought this. Patripassianism said the Father Himself hung on the wood. Theopaschitism said the divine nature took the nails. Chalcedon answered both. One Person. Two natures. Unconfused. The Son of God suffered as man, in the flesh He assumed. Cyril of Alexandria said it without flinching. He suffered impassibly. The subject is the Son. The nature that can bleed is the human nature. The divine essence is not diminished, wounded, or rewritten by Friday afternoon.

That does not shrink the cross. It gives the cross its weight. An infinite Person offering a true human life and a true human death is not less mercy than a God who got His feelings hurt. It is more. The divine nature did not collapse into the pain. It upheld the suffering and made it of infinite worth. If the Godhead itself can be traumatized, you do not have an atonement. You have a crisis inside eternity.

Popular preaching loves the line that “our God is a suffering God.” Sometimes it is only a clumsy way of saying Christ was a man of sorrows. Sometimes it is Moltmann with a worship set. The first is gospel. The second is a renovation project on the being of God.

You Do Not Need a Drowning Lifeguard

Here is the pastoral lie at the bottom of the passible-God fashion. People in the torrent think they need a rescuer who is as wet and panicked as they are. They do not. They need a man on the granite, feet planted, not being swept by the same current that is killing them.

A God whose love can be extinguished by your failure is not a refuge. He is a weather report. A God whose peace depends on the week you just had cannot hold you when the week gets worse. A God whose promises are reactionary feelings can take them back when He “changes His mind.” That is why Jack Hibbs keeps pointing people to the unchanging promise as an anchor. The harbor floor does not heave because the deck does.

Divine affections in the old sense are not mood swings. God is love. He does not slip into it when we behave. His mercy and His wrath are the outward effects of one holy will, not inner bruises He received from us. That is better news than a deity who needs our pain to feel authentic.

The age that measures love by emotional damage will keep calling this cold. Let them. A God who can be managed by our anguish is a god we can eventually ignore. The God who cannot be wounded is the only One strong enough to pull a drowning world out of the water without going under Himself.

Twenty Coptic laborers were marched onto a Libyan beach in orange jumpsuits and told to deny Christ. Beside them stood a Ghanaian who had not come to Libya to die for Jesus. He watched them refuse. Then he chose their God and their grave.

That is the story that needs to be told again and again until everyone hears it. Change the circumstances and it could have easily been a story from the Book of Acts. That’s how powerful it can and should be.

On February 15, 2015, Islamic State fighters released a video they titled “A Message Signed with Blood to the Nation of the Cross.” Twenty Egyptian Copts and one African worker knelt in the sand near Sirte. Knives came out. The men prayed. Most of the Egyptians were from Minya, thirteen of them from the village of Al-Our. They had gone to Libya for construction wages. ISIS kidnapped them in late 2014 and January 2015, starved them, beat them, and offered them Islam as a way out. None of the twenty took it.

Then there was the twenty-first.

Subscribe now

Their God Is My God

His name was Matthew Ayariga. He was a migrant worker from Ghana. He was not Coptic. He had not grown up in those Nile villages. He was not on the first lists the Church in Minya released, because the first lists only had twenty names. The camera made the difference obvious. One dark-skinned man in a line of Egyptian faces.

The killers gave him the easy door. Reject Christ. Walk away from the Copts. Live. A Barnabas Aid account of that moment is the one the faithful have carried ever since. A terrorist asked him if he rejected Christ and demanded he follow Islam. Ayariga looked at the men who had already decided to die and answered for the record of Heaven.

Their God is my God.

He was killed with them. Twenty Christians went to that beach prepared to die. Twenty-one were martyred. A recent remembrance put it the same way, and it is the right way. He saw their faith and he wanted that God more than he wanted another year of paid work in a broken country.

This is not complicated theology. It is the oldest Christian arithmetic there is. A man watches other men refuse to curse Jesus, and something in him breaks open. The sand becomes a baptistry. The knife becomes the seal.

Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.

They Filmed It to Frighten Rome

ISIS did not hide the motive. The lead executioner talked at the camera about the “Nation of the Cross” and promised they would conquer Rome. They dressed the laborers like the prisoners in their other snuff films. They rehearsed. They wanted the West to flinch and the Copts to recant.

It failed on both counts. CBN later reported what a captured guard admitted. The men had already been tortured for weeks. The beach was the third pass with cameras rolling. Still they prayed. Witnesses and families say the last words on many lips were “Ya Rabbi Yasou” — O Lord Jesus.

That is not a political slogan. That is a man handing his spirit to the same Lord Stephen saw standing while the stones fell.

Egypt answered with airstrikes. The world answered with a news cycle and then a shrug. Al-Our answered by building a church.

The Twenty-First Body Came Home Last

The remains were found in a mass grave after an ISIS prisoner talked. The twenty Egyptians were flown home in May 2018 and laid in the Church of the Martyrs of Faith and Homeland in Al-Our. Ayariga had no family claiming him in Ghana that the authorities could find. His body sat unclaimed until September 2020, when Libya released it and Egypt received the last brother. The Christian Post recorded the scene. A mother who had already buried two sons said their joy was complete.

Pope Tawadros II had already written all twenty-one names into the Coptic synaxarium a week after the video. In 2023 Pope Francis entered them in the Roman Martyrology as a sign that the blood was also a seed of unity. Last month the Diocese of Fort Worth announced what the comfortable American church is late to notice. St. Matthew Ayariga Catholic Church in Arlington will be the first parish in the world under his patronage, and the first Ghanaian national Catholic parish in the United States. Dedication is set for January 29, 2027.

Bishop Michael Olson said the terrorists meant to silence the Name and instead handed the world witnesses. He is right. A short film, The 21, produced with Jonathan Roumie as executive producer, was shortlisted for an Academy Award in 2025. Hollywood noticing a Coptic martyrdom is not the miracle. The miracle is that a Ghanaian laborer looked at twenty doomed Copts and decided their Christ was worth the blade.

Do Not Look Away

International Christian Concern marked the tenth anniversary last year and quoted Commissioner Vicky Hartzler. Remember the twenty-one young men murdered solely for being Christian. The age of martyrs did not close with Nero or the Soviet camps. It is open. Nigeria bleeds. Egypt still buries. Libya still has sand that held their blood. Soft churches in the West treat “martyr” like a branding word for people who lost a follower count.

Ayariga did not lose a follower count. He gained a confession. Twenty men walked onto that beach already belonging to Christ. One man walked on as a spectator and walked into eternity as a brother. That is why the count is twenty-one. That is why the shrine in Al-Our has a twenty-first place. That is why a parish in Texas will bear a Ghanaian name most Americans still cannot pronounce.

Never forget the twenty-one. Say the sentence he gave the killers, and mean it before it costs you anything. Their God is my God.

John Calvin did not write a polite suggestion. He wrote a demand. Late in 1543 he prepared The Necessity of Reforming the Church for Emperor Charles V and the German princes gathering at the Diet of Speyer. The church, he said, could no longer tell a sinner how God must be worshiped or where peace with God could be found. That was not a branding problem. That was death.

The title of the work is the argument. Necessity. Not mood. Not taste. Not a committee’s five-year plan. If the Word of God has been buried, delay is disobedience.

Subscribe now

Two Questions That Decide Everything

Calvin refused to drown the emperor in every disputed ceremony. He narrowed the case to two questions that swallow the rest. How is God rightly worshiped? Where is salvation found? Images, prayers to the dead, justification, the sacraments, discipline, and church government all matter because they either serve those two concerns or they destroy them.

When these are kept out of view, though we may glory in the name of Christians, our profession is empty and vain.

That sentence should still make pastors sweat. A crowded building and a Christian label prove nothing. R.C. Sproul later put the same fight in the language of the solas. The formal cause was authority. The material cause was justification. Scripture binds the conscience. Faith receives Christ. Works do not buy what Christ already purchased.

Worship Became Theater and Idolatry

Calvin’s charge against the worship of his day was not that it lacked beauty. It lacked obedience. God forbids new worship unsanctioned by His Word. Invented rites offended Him. By that standard, Calvin said the common form of worship was “nothing but mere corruption.” He called it gross idolatry. Images. Saints as mediators. A table turned into a repeated sacrifice. Ceremonies stacked on ceremonies until the people could no longer tell the difference between Christ’s ordinance and a priest’s invention.

This is where the modern church likes to smirk at the sixteenth century and then repeat the same sin with better lighting. If God did not command it, enthusiasm does not baptize it.

In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

That was Christ’s verdict on a religious class that loved tradition more than the commandment of God. It was not aimed only at Rome.

Salvation Was Buried Under Works

The second question is more brutal. Where does a guilty man find peace? Calvin said men, “intoxicated with a fatal confidence in works, sought salvation anywhere rather than in Christ.” The benefit of redemption was frustrated. Grace lay half-buried, then torn. That is not a metaphor for bruised feelings. That is a description of a system that points sinners to penance, merit, purgatory, and purchased relief instead of to the finished work of the Son.

Justification is God’s courtroom declaration, not a drip of sacramental improvement that might hold if you keep the appointments. Rome still treats justification as a process the church manages. The Reformers treated it as a verdict God speaks over the one who believes. If that verdict can be postponed, sold, or topped off by human satisfaction, Christ is no longer enough. He is a helper. Helpers do not save.

Sacraments Became Merchandise and Pastors Became Tyrants

Robert Godfrey notes that Calvin treated worship and salvation as the soul of the church, sacraments and government as the body. The body had rotted. Ceremonies invented by men were ranked with mysteries instituted by Christ. The Lord’s Supper became a theatrical exhibition. Its use was converted into trafficking for gain. That is a polite way of saying souls were priced.

Then came the shepherds. Calvin said those who sat in the seat of pastors injured the church first by dissolute lives and then by a cruel tyranny over souls, leading men like sheep to the slaughter. He denied that the Roman see was apostolic. He denied that the man who persecuted the gospel was the vicar of Christ. He denied that the one tearing the church from her only Head could claim to be her head. Soft ecumenism hates that paragraph. Scripture does not.

Liberty of conscience was not a slogan for Calvin. It was blood-bought. “This freedom, which was purchased by the blood of Christ, cannot be infringed.” Human laws dressed up as holiness still bind what Christ has loosed. The costume changes. The bondage does not.

Reform That Waits Is Reform That Lies

Calvin organized the treatise around the diseases, the remedies, and the reason the patient could not wait. The church was not mildly unwell. Doctrine was adulterated. Worship was vitiated by superstition. Sacraments were profaned. Government had become confusion and devastation. When God raised up Luther and those who followed, they did not discover a new religion. They lit a torch in a room that had grown dark on purpose.

The same two questions judge this hour. Who may prescribe worship? Where may the conscience rest before God? A church that answers with brand, vibe, politics, or papal memory has already left the text. A church that cannot say, without stuttering, that a sinner is justified by faith in Christ alone has already started selling something else.

Calvin wrote for an imperial diet almost five centuries ago. Charles V did not become a Reformer. The questions outlived the emperor. They will outlive the present mood as well. Every congregation that wants Christ to rule by His Word still has to answer them, and the answer cannot be a shrug.

Most Christians believe the universe is billions of years old. Some treat the six days of creation as a metaphor. Others latch onto explanations such as Gap Theory or Day-Age Theory to reconcile. But there is one theory that I’ve found after years of on-and-off research that has legs. In fact, it has fewer scientific and mathematical holes than the Big Bang Theory itself.

The distant starlight argument is the favorite club skeptics swing at Genesis. Light from a galaxy ten billion light-years away cannot reach Earth in six thousand years if light crawls at 186,000 miles per second. Therefore, they say, Moses was wrong, the genealogies are poetry, and the universe is old enough to make God unnecessary.

Most young-earthers replies try to fix the numbers by rewriting the physics. Slow the speed of light in the past. Stretch clocks with a gravitational well. Declare that incoming light is instantaneous by convention. Each of those has been tried. Each one runs into measurements that refuse to cooperate.

There is another way to think about it. It does not require a new constant. It does not invent a private relativity. It takes the first chapter of Scripture as a description of a real physical event and then follows general relativity where the energy density of that event would have to go.

Subscribe now

The Problem They Think Settles the Matter

Andromeda is about 2.5 million light-years away. The farthest galaxies in the Hubble and Webb deep fields sit billions of light-years out. If the universe is only thousands of years old by earthly clocks, the light should not be here yet. That is the distant starlight problem in one paragraph.

The same critics rarely mention that the Big Bang has a twin embarrassment. The cosmic microwave background is almost the same temperature in every direction. Regions of the early sky that could never have exchanged light under standard expansion somehow thermalized anyway. That is the horizon problem. Inflation was invented to paper over it. Creationists did not invent special pleading. Cosmology did.

Answers in Genesis has pointed this out for years. Light-travel time is not a one-way weapon. It cuts both directions. The question is which account of origins is allowed to propose a mechanism and which one is shouted down for even trying.

The Patches That Did Not Hold

Barry Setterfield’s decaying speed of light looked promising until supernova 1987A and the rest of the spectroscopic record refused to play along. A million-fold drop in c would have wrecked atomic energies, orbital mechanics, and the mass-energy relation that every clock in the universe depends on. Jason Lisle walked through the wreckage. The numbers do not work.

Light created in transit solves the travel time by putting finished photons in the beam already aimed at Earth. It also puts finished supernovae, finished galaxy collisions, and finished histories into the sky that never happened. That is not mature creation. That is a painted backdrop. God does not need to fake a war in heaven so Adam can enjoy the view.

Russell Humphreys’ white-hole cosmology was the most serious gravitational attempt. Earth near the center of a bounded cosmos. Time crawling on the inside while the outer universe aged. The qualitative picture is beautiful. The quantitative picture is not. Given the mass we actually see, including dark matter, the dilation is a rounding error, not a factor of a million. Stronger dilation would have painted a blueshift across the sky. We see redshift instead. Humphreys himself moved on to later models. Creation Ministries International has catalogued the lineage without pretending any of them is finished physics.

Lisle’s anisotropic synchrony convention is a different animal. It is a choice about how to stamp clocks, not a claim that photons sprint toward Earth at infinite speed as a physical law. As a convention it is allowed by relativity. As a substitute for a creation mechanism it leaves the reader holding a definition instead of a cause. Useful. Not the same thing as “God spoke, and spacetime answered.”

Take the First Verse as Physics

Genesis 1 does not open with a metaphor. It opens with an act. God speaks a universe into being from nothing. Whatever else that means theologically, it describes a moment of energy density that makes every later explosion look polite. The earliest instant of any cosmology, secular or sacred, is a state so compact that the ordinary distinction between energy, mass, and geometry collapses.

General relativity already knows what happens there. Clocks run slow where energy density is high. Not a little slow. The dilation factor grows with the square root of the density ratio. Push the initial density toward the Planck scale and the factor lands near ten to the sixtieth power.

That number is not a magic wand pulled from a study Bible. The present age of the cosmos, measured in Planck times, is itself on the order of 10⁶⁰. Dirac noticed large-number coincidences like this a century ago. Creation at Planck-scale density is exactly the regime where a few thousand years of proper time on a forming Earth can sit beside what distant clocks would record as billions of years of cosmic process.

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

If the verse is true, the opening state was not a quiet garden with a slow fuse. It was a spoken singularity. Relativity does not get a vote on whether God may do that. It only gets a vote on what clocks do afterward.

Expansion Does the Rest of the Work

The useful feature of this picture is that it does not need a second miracle to unscrew the dilation. As the universe expands and cools, energy density falls. The dilation factor falls with it. Earth clocks do not require a separate catch-up device. The same expansion that stretches space bleeds off the extreme curvature that was freezing time in the first place.

Early on, a day on Earth can correspond to an enormous interval of process in the thinning outer cosmos. Later, the two timelines converge. Today they run in sync, which is why GPS satellites need only the ordinary, tiny relativistic corrections and not a factor of a googol.

That is the difference between a patch and a consequence. A patch adds a new law because Genesis is inconvenient. A consequence starts with the event Genesis describes and asks what Einstein’s field equations do when the density is that high. You can reject the premise. You cannot say the inference is smuggling in a rewritten speed of light.

The Objection That Has to Be Faced

This framework predicts something specific if Earth occupied a privileged density peak at the beginning. The cosmic microwave background should carry an anisotropy pattern tied to that position. The data we have do not show it. The CMB is astonishingly smooth aside from the dipole caused by our motion through the rest frame. That is a real problem and, transparently, I have no certain solution for it.

It may be that the dilation was global rather than geocentric, a property of the initial energy state rather than a well with Earth at the bottom. It may be that later expansion washed the signature below what current instruments can isolate. It may be that the model is wrong. Honesty is not optional just because the text of Genesis is non-negotiable.

What is optional is the sneer that biblical chronology has no physical hypotheses left. It does. This is one of them, and it’s by far my favorite. It uses the same relativity the textbooks already teach. It refuses to change c. It refuses to paint fake supernovae into the beam. It treats “Let there be” as the highest-density event the cosmos will ever know, and then it lets clocks behave the way clocks behave in that regime.

What the Heavens Are For

The point of the sky was never to give materialists a calendar they could use against Moses. The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Distant galaxies are not a lawsuit. They are a sermon. The question is whether the sermon was preached over six days of Earth time or over fourteen billion years of nobody’s particular purpose.

Exodus 20:11 still sits in the way of every attempt to slide eons into the week. The same Lord who carved the tablets said He made heaven, earth, sea, and all that in them is in six days. We must take the Word of God literally when it is being literal. It is the reason the Sabbath exists. If the creation week was a metaphor, the Fourth Commandment is a metaphor, and we are back to inventing religion after the fact.

None of this requires pretending that every creationist cosmology is finished. Humphreys was incomplete. Setterfield was incomplete. Lisle’s convention does not replace a dynamical history. The energy-density argument is incomplete too, and the microwave sky is the first place critics will look. Incomplete is not the same as impossible. The Big Bang is incomplete in a dozen places and still gets treated as liturgy.

God spoke. The universe answered with energy dense enough to bend time. Expansion cooled the bend. Earth clocks and cosmic clocks found each other. That may not be the final word. It is a better word than “Moses could not have known about Andromeda, so ignore him.”

The light got here. The text says the light was for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years. It does not say the light was for giving skeptics a veto.

Most of us wait until the danger has passed before we get generous. We call it prudence. Scripture has a harder word for it. It is unbelief dressed up as budgeting.

A Joni and Friends devotion sent readers back to a nameless man from Baalshalisha in 2 Kings 4. The land was in famine. The sons of the prophets were sitting with Elisha at Gilgal. A pot of stew had already nearly poisoned the company. Then this farmer walks in with twenty barley loaves and a sack of fresh ears of grain. Firstfruits. The first and best of a harvest that should not have existed.

He did not bring leftovers after the family was fed. He brought the portion that belonged to God while the country was still hungry.

And there came a man from Baalshalisha, and brought the man of God bread of the firstfruits, twenty loaves of barley, and full ears of corn in the husk thereof. And he said, Give unto the people, that they may eat.

Elisha did not stash it. He did not thank the man and send him home with a receipt. He told his servant to feed a hundred men with what would barely have covered twenty. The servant did what servants still do. He ran the numbers.

What, should I set this before an hundred men?

That is the voice of every church committee, every household budget, and every Christian who has ever said he will give more once things settle down. The math was not wrong. Twenty barley cakes for a hundred mouths is a short meal. Barley was the poor man’s grain, sometimes animal feed. The problem was not the arithmetic. The problem was who the servant thought was doing the feeding.

Elisha answered with a word from the Lord. They shall eat, and shall leave thereof. The servant set the bread down. They ate. They had leftovers. The text is almost blunt about it. It happened according to the word of the Lord, not according to the size of the sack.

Subscribe now

Firstfruits Are Not a Tip

Under the Law, firstfruits belonged to God and were given to the priests. In the northern kingdom the Levitical system had already collapsed. Faithful Israelites still had to decide whom they would treat as the Lord’s representative. This man brought his offering to the prophet. That was not a loophole. It was loyalty. While Baal’s name sat on his hometown, he carried bread to the man of God.

Firstfruits were never about agriculture as such. They were a public confession that the field, the rain, and the next harvest all belonged to Someone else. You gave the first because you trusted Him for the rest. You did not wait to see whether the rest would come.

That is why the later feasts keep pressing the same point. Israel waved firstfruits after Passover. Christ rose on that feast as the firstfruits of them that slept, a connection Harbinger’s Daily has drawn with the rest of the spring calendar. The pattern is older than our offering envelopes. God takes the first. Then He proves He can keep His people alive on what remains.

Centuries later a boy handed Jesus five barley loaves and two fish. The disciples asked the same question Elisha’s servant asked. The Christian Post has noted how cheap that barley lunch would have looked to a crowd. Christ blessed it anyway. Thousands ate. Twelve baskets came back. The God of Elisha had not changed His method. He still multiplies what is placed in His hands first.

Leftover Religion

We live in the opposite spirit. Americans have been shrinking their charity for years, and economic fear only accelerates the reflex. Give after the bills. Give after the vacation. Give if anything is left. A Gallup finding reported by Fox News already showed faith sliding out of daily life for half the country. When God is no longer first in the heart, He will not be first in the wallet, the calendar, or the attention span.

The Joni and Friends line is the right one. Giving God the first portion is not generosity. It is a declaration. You are saying He is your source, not your surplus.

Joni Eareckson Tada has lived that sentence with a body the world would call a deficit. After the diving accident, the wheelchair, the decades of pain, she kept offering what she had. CBN recorded her calling those years “small moments of drastic obedience.” Wheelchairs went out. Bibles went with them. The ministry did not wait for ease. It treated a broken life as firstfruits and watched the Lord make it feed more people than the original offering could explain.

That is the scandal of this little story. The famine did not end before the gift was given. The hundred were not a manageable crowd. The bread was not impressive. Faith moved first. Provision followed.

But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

The unnamed man from Baalshalisha will not be remembered for his yield or his name. He will be remembered because he refused to treat the Lord like a leftover. Twenty loaves walked into a famine. A hundred men walked out full. The only thing that stretched was the word God had already spoken.

The question is not whether you have enough. The question is whether the first piece still belongs to Him.

Important note: This type of story is often used by preachers of the “prosperity gospel” to get poor people to donate all they have. Be discerning about who receives your gifts as not all are used on behalf of God.

The world is loud right now. Markets twitch. Nations rattle sabers. Influencers sell enlightenment in thirty-second clips. Politicians promise a kingdom they cannot build. And underneath all of it sits the same old ache. People are hungry for meaning, terrified of death, and exhausted by their own secrets.

Tom Gilbreath put it plainly last week. With all the chaos and confusion in the world, think again about Jesus. Not the mascot. Not the stained-glass suggestion. The One who claimed to be life and sustenance, truth and light. That claim is either the most arrogant sentence in history or the only sentence that can save a man.

It is not a leap in the dark. It is a look at the record.

Subscribe now

He Did Not Appear Out of Nowhere

Jesus did not wander onto the stage like some first-century guru with a new brand. His arrival had been advertised for centuries. Lineage first. Abraham. Isaac. Jacob. Judah. Jesse. David. The prophets were not guessing. They named the family tree and then they named the town. Bethlehem.

A virgin birth. A teacher who would speak in parables. A healer of the deaf, the blind, the lame, and the mute. A light to the nations. Betrayed for thirty pieces of silver. Beaten. Beard torn. Clothes gambled over while He died. Buried with the rich after dying among the wicked.

CBN has catalogued hundreds of those Old Testament markers, written long before Rome ever hung a man on a cross. Psalm 22 reads like an eyewitness report of crucifixion centuries before that particular cruelty was common. Daniel laid down a timetable and said the Messiah would be cut off. Then history happened on schedule.

Skeptics wave this off as coincidence until they have to stack the coincidences. One prophecy can be massaged. A dozen start to look like a fingerprint. Add the miracles. Add the beauty of His person. Add an empty tomb that His enemies could have shut down with a body and never did. That is not folklore. That is a résumé.

The Whole Life Matches the Pattern

It was never just isolated predictions. The entire arc was written in advance. He would live without sin. He would be despised anyway. Isaiah 53 does not read like poetry for a rainy afternoon. It reads like a charge sheet and a pardon in the same breath.

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

That is not how men invent gods. Men invent gods who win on the first try and never bleed. This Servant is rejected, crushed, silent before His accusers, and then not left in the grave. Psalm 16 said the Holy One would not see corruption. Isaiah said the government would be on His shoulder and of the increase of His government there would be no end. Daniel said His dominion would not pass away. John later wrote that He is alive forevermore.

All of it converges on one Person in history. Not a committee. Not a movement. A man who walked dusty roads, told the truth, and then got up after they killed Him.

He Alone Answers the Need We Keep Denying

Here is the part polite religion hates. Jesus does not offer a self-help upgrade. He claims to be the meal, the light, the door, the shepherd, the resurrection, the way, the truth, the life, and the vine. Those are not metaphors for a nicer Monday. They are exclusive claims. Either He is what He said or He is a liar not worth quoting at funerals.

Isaiah already explained the transaction. He had done no violence. There was no deceit in His mouth. So why the wounds? Why the grief? Why the stripes?

All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

We know that verse is true because we live backstage in our own lives. We know what we hide. We know the soul that sins shall die. No campaign, no therapy brand, no new identity, and no amount of public virtue can pay that debt. History is littered with corpses of men who said they could. Jesus is not like them.

His life tells you your life has meaning. His death paid for the sin you cannot outrun. His resurrection puts a spine in the promise of eternal life. That is why Peter could stand in front of the same religious machine that wanted him quiet and say there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.

But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

The age will keep manufacturing saviors. It always does. Trust the One who showed up on time, fit the ancient pattern, and still meets the need no government and no guru can touch.

John’s list of Babylon’s cargo begins the way any inventory of a rich civilization begins. Gold, silver, precious stones, pearls. Then fine linen and purple and silk and scarlet. Then ivory, brass, iron, marble. Then the commodities of ordinary appetite, cinnamon and incense and ointment and wine and oil and fine flour and wheat. Then livestock, cattle and sheep. Then transportation, horses and chariots. And then, at the very bottom of the manifest, after the spices and the furniture and the freight, the last two entries.

And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

The order is the argument. A civilization does not begin by selling people. It begins by selling metal and cloth, works its way through food and animals and transport, and arrives at human beings only when everything else has already been priced.

The Greek word rendered “slaves” is somaton, which simply means bodies, and it was the ordinary commercial term of the ancient world for a person you owned. What makes the verse land is that John did not stop there. He added a second category, souls of men, and commentators have argued for two thousand years about whether that phrase intensifies the first or names something worse.

We are in a position to answer that question, because four separate industries are currently running the experiment. None of them requires a prophecy chart to see. They require a search engine and the willingness to look at what the numbers actually describe.

Subscribe now

The Ledger Nobody Disputes

Start with the least controversial number. The International Labour Organization, together with Walk Free and the International Organization for Migration, estimates that 50 million people were living in modern slavery in 2021, 28 million in forced labor and 22 million in forced marriage. That figure rose by 10 million in five years. Eighty-six percent of forced labor sits in the private sector rather than in state camps, and the annual illegal profit generated by it is estimated at $236 billion, of which roughly $172.6 billion comes from commercial sexual exploitation.

The detail that should stop a Western reader is geographic. More than half of all forced labor is found in upper-middle-income and high-income countries. This is not a problem confined to failed states and jungle mining camps. It is embedded in the supply chains of the wealthiest economies on earth, which is precisely the condition Revelation 18 describes.

Babylon is not poor. Babylon is the richest thing anyone has ever seen, and its merchants are the ones weeping when the market closes.

The Contract Read Out Loud

Chattel slavery required a legal category. What replaced it required only a legal instrument.

In May 2025, Arcadia police in Los Angeles County responded to a hospital report that a two-month-old had suffered a traumatic head injury. What they found led to 21 children being taken into protective custody, nearly all of them born to surrogate mothers scattered across the country, all of them traced to the same couple.

Guojun Xuan and Silvia Zhang did not merely hire an agency. Investigators determined that the children were the product of a surrogacy operation the couple themselves owned. Surrogates recruited through Facebook were shown a profile describing a family struggling to conceive a second child. They were not told that the intended parents ran the agency, or how many women were carrying at the same time.

The couple denies wrongdoing. They say they wanted a large family. No criminal charges have been filed. Zhang told the Wall Street Journal, “We never sell our babies.”

Take her at her word, and the case gets worse rather than better. Because when two surrogates in Virginia cut off contact and declined to hand over the newborns they had carried, Xuan and Zhang did not report a kidnapping. They filed suit for breach of contract, demanding custody of the infants and $1 million from each woman, against original agreements of $70,000 and $45,000 plus expenses. A million dollars in damages for failure to deliver.

That is the sentence worth sitting with. Not because anyone said the word “sale,” but because nobody had to. The transaction was already structured as one, and the remedy sought was the remedy any merchant seeks when a shipment does not arrive.

And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, that they might drink.

Joel was not describing a black market. He was describing casual commerce, the kind conducted by people who would be genuinely offended at being called traffickers.

Tyre Kept the Same Books

Revelation 18 is not the first cargo manifest in Scripture. Ezekiel 27 runs an almost identical list against Tyre, the commercial superpower of its day, itemizing silver and iron and tin and lead, ivory and ebony, emeralds and coral, wheat and honey and oil, lambs and rams and goats. And in the middle of that inventory sits the thirteenth verse.

Javan, Tubal, and Meshech, they were thy merchants: they traded the persons of men and vessels of brass in thy market.

Persons of men and vessels of brass, listed together, priced by the same clerk. John was not inventing a new indictment. He was telling his readers that the pattern they knew from Ezekiel would run one final time, at maximum scale, at the peak of human commercial achievement. Which raises the uncomfortable question of what has actually changed since Tyre. The technology improved. The paperwork got better. The moral logic is identical, and so is the self-congratulation of the merchants.

A Market Built on Prisoners

In May 2025, the House of Representatives passed the Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act by a vote of 406 to 1. Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Brian Mast argued on the floor that “The human body is not a currency. It’s not a commodity.”

The lone dissenting vote came from Rep. Thomas Massie, which is worth noting for anyone who has mistaken procedural purity for principle.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Chris Smith, has described an industry that treats the human body as inventory and generates as much as $1.7 billion annually. The China Tribunal, an independent panel that reviewed evidence over twelve months, concluded that state-sanctioned forced organ harvesting of prisoners of conscience amounts to crimes against humanity. Nine United Nations special rapporteurs have called on Beijing to answer the allegations. Estimates of scale vary widely and remain difficult to verify, which is exactly what a regime with no transparent donor registry and no independent hospital access would prefer.

More than a year after that 406 to 1 vote, the Senate companion has still not become law. It cleared the Foreign Relations Committee in June 2026 and was reported to the full Senate in late July. Sanctioning people who kill prisoners for their kidneys polls at roughly 100 percent, and it still cannot get floor time. An earlier version died in the same committee without a vote.

Then there was the microphone. On September 3, 2025, walking toward the reviewing stand at a military parade in Beijing, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin were overheard on a livestream carried by China’s own state broadcaster. Putin’s translator was heard saying that human organs can be continuously transplanted, that a person grows younger the longer he lives, that immortality is conceivable. Xi replied that some predict humans in this century may live to 150. Putin confirmed the exchange to reporters afterward. The broadcast drew 1.9 billion views online.

Set aside the futurism. Notice the assumption underneath it. A supply of replacement parts is taken for granted by the two men least likely to be asked where it comes from.

The Part Where We Cannot Point East

It would be convenient to file all of this under foreign atrocity. Revelation does not permit that exit, because the last item on the manifest is not bodies. It is souls of men, and the difference matters.

According to its parent company’s own corporate filings, OnlyFans processed $7.22 billion in gross fan payments in fiscal 2024, across 377.5 million fan accounts and 4.63 million creator accounts. No trafficker recruited most of those creators. They signed up. And the average one earns roughly $131 a month, which means the overwhelming majority sold something irrecoverable for the price of a phone bill while a fraction of one percent took the actual money.

That is a market in souls of men operating entirely on consent, and consent turns out not to be the moral firewall the culture assumed it was. A civilization can arrive at the bottom of Babylon’s manifest without a single slave ship, simply by convincing enough people to list themselves.

Why the Merchants Weep

The most damning line in Revelation 18 is not the inventory. It is the reaction. When Babylon falls, the merchants of the earth weep and mourn, and the text is explicit about why. No man buyeth their merchandise any more. Not one of them grieves for the people on the list. They grieve for the market.

Whether Revelation 18 is describing first-century Rome, a future system, or the recurring character of every commercial civilization that outlives its conscience, the diagnostic value is the same. Scripture predicted that human beings would eventually be entered into the ledger, priced against wheat and cattle and freight, and that the men holding the ledger would be sincerely bewildered at the suggestion they had done anything wrong.

That prediction is no longer waiting on events. It is waiting on someone to read the manifest out loud.

There is a decent chance the sermon you heard last Sunday was written, in whole or in part, by a machine, and an even better chance nobody told you. That is not speculation. It is now the documented norm in American churches, and it happened in roughly three years with almost no congregational debate.

According to survey data reported by The Christian Post, nearly two-thirds of church leaders who prepare sermons now use AI tools in the writing process. The 2025 State of AI in the Church report, based on responses from 594 pastors and church staff, found that 61 percent of pastors use AI weekly or daily, up from 43 percent just a year earlier, with a quarter using it every single day.

ChatGPT leads the pack. Follow-up research in 2026 shows the sermon number holding steady at about two-thirds, meaning this is not a fad burning itself out. It is the new baseline. CBN and Faithwire both covered the findings, and the survey’s own researchers noted churches are still “grappling with the weighty ethical and practical considerations involved.”

Grappling quietly, apparently. Because the striking feature of this revolution is its silence. The people in the pews were never asked.

Subscribe now

Let’s Be Fair About What This Is and Isn’t

Honesty requires distinctions. A pastor who uses AI the way he once used a concordance, to pull cross-references, check historical background, or organize research, has changed his tools, not his calling. Pastors have leaned on commentaries and other men’s outlines for centuries.

If the technology frees a shepherd from administrative drudgery to spend more hours with his flock, some of this is genuinely good. The surveys suggest much of the usage falls into exactly these categories, and that share of the story deserves to be told straight.

But the same surveys show the frontier moving. Nearly one in five pastors say they would use AI to answer congregants’ questions. Sermon “preparation” is an elastic word that stretches from research assistance to wholesale generation, and no one is auditing where any given pastor sits on that spectrum. The direction of travel is unmistakable, and it runs toward delegation of the one task that cannot be delegated.

Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. (2 Timothy 4:2)

Paul’s charge to Timothy is personal and unavoidable. Preach the word. Not curate the word, not prompt for the word, not approve the word after a machine drafts it. The sermon is not a content product. It is the overflow of a man’s own wrestling with the text before God, on behalf of a specific flock whose wounds and sins and questions he knows by name. A pastor who has not labored in the passage has nothing to preach, even if he has something polished to read.

The Question of Authority

And consider what sits on the other end of the prompt. These models are trained on the open internet, tuned by Silicon Valley companies, and shaped by worldviews that treat biblical Christianity as one dataset among many, and not a favored one.

When a pastor asks a chatbot what a passage means, he is consulting a system with no fear of God, no indwelling Spirit, and no accountability to any confession. It will produce something fluent, plausible, and subtly formed by assumptions its user cannot see. Fluency is not anointing. Plausibility is not truth.

The path forward is not panic but transparency and boundaries. Congregations should ask their pastors, directly and charitably, how these tools are used, and pastors should answer without embarrassment or evasion.

Research assistance is one thing. Outsourced proclamation is another, and a church that cannot tell the difference will eventually stop noticing that anything is missing. That is the real danger. Not that the machine preaches badly, but that it preaches well enough that nobody asks who is speaking.

Paul told the church at Ephesus exactly where the real conflict lies:

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” — Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)

If we wrestle not against flesh and blood, then our fixation on flesh-and-blood enemies is a category error, and a convenient one for the actual enemy. There are three fronts in this war worth examining honestly. There is the enemy without. There is the deception of the good. And there is the traitor within.

Subscribe now

The Battlefield Is Spiritual

The materialist frame of our culture insists that everything has a human explanation and a human solution. Fix the policy, remove the person, reform the institution, and the evil goes away. Anyone who has watched evil simply change addresses after such reforms knows better. Paul knew better too:

“For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)” — 2 Corinthians 10:3-4 (KJV)

Peter goes further and describes an adversary who is not passive but actively hunting:

“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.” — 1 Peter 5:8 (KJV)

Seeking. That word deserves attention. Temptation is not merely something we stumble into like weather. There is intent behind it, targeting, patience. And the same enemy who hunts individuals has blinded a whole world system, as Paul writes, for “the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not” (2 Corinthians 4:4). A blinded world does not see the war. That is the point of the blinding.

Good People, Deceived

Here is where the conventional picture of evil breaks down completely. If the enemy’s work were carried out only by cackling villains, it would be easy to resist. It is not carried out that way, and Scripture warns us it never would be:

“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” — 2 Corinthians 11:14 (KJV)

Evil rarely arrives looking evil. It arrives looking compassionate, reasonable, progressive, safe. And it does not need bad people to advance it. It prefers good ones. Consider the most sobering exchange in the Gospels on this point. Peter had just confessed Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God. Minutes later, out of genuine love, he pulled Jesus aside to protest the coming crucifixion. And Jesus turned to him and said:

“Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” — Matthew 16:23 (KJV)

Peter was not a villain. He was a devoted disciple who became, for a moment, a mouthpiece for the enemy through his own good intentions. If it happened to Peter standing in the physical presence of Christ, we should abandon any confidence that it cannot happen to us.

The mechanism of this deception is usually not seduction into obvious sin. It is redefinition. Isaiah pronounced woe on “them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness” (Isaiah 5:20). Once the labels are switched, good people pursue evil ends while believing themselves righteous, and no further persuasion is required. Add to this the slow corruption of proximity, for “evil communications corrupt good manners” (1 Corinthians 15:33), and you have the complete toolkit by which decent people are conscripted into wickedness without ever signing up.

The Traitor Within

It would be comforting to stop there, with a war between an external enemy and deceived-but-innocent believers. Scripture does not permit us that comfort. The prophet Jeremiah delivers the diagnosis:

“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” — Jeremiah 17:9 (KJV)

Our fallen nature means the enemy does not have to break down the door. He knocks, and something inside us wants to answer. Even Paul, arguably the most spiritually accomplished man of his generation, confessed the war inside himself:

“For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.” — Romans 7:19 (KJV)

This is why the flesh “lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other” (Galatians 5:17). We are not neutral ground being fought over by two outside armies. Part of us is already sympathetic to the invasion. Any strategy for resisting spiritual wickedness that does not account for our own predisposition to rationalize it will fail, because the most persuasive voice for compromise is usually our own.

The Lie That We Are Strong Enough

Nowhere is that internal sympathy more visible than in what we choose to consume. The modern believer has largely made peace with entertainment that previous generations of Christians would have recognized instantly as spiritual poison. The occult repackaged as fantasy. Degradation repackaged as comedy. Darkness repackaged as prestige drama. And the justification is nearly always the same. I am mature enough. It does not affect me. I can handle it.

Paul answered that justification directly:

“Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” — 1 Corinthians 10:12 (KJV)

The confidence that we are immune is not evidence of strength. It is the first casualty of the battle. Solomon asked the obvious question: “Can a man take fire in his bosom, and his clothes not be burned?” (Proverbs 6:27). Nobody believes the answer is yes when the subject is literal fire, yet we believe it constantly when the subject is what we set before our eyes and ears night after night.

David, a king with every entertainment of his age at his disposal, set a different standard:

“I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes: I hate the work of them that turn aside; it shall not cleave to me.” — Psalm 101:3 (KJV)

Notice that David’s standard was input discipline, not output confidence. He did not claim he could watch wickedness without effect. He refused to set it before his eyes at all, and Paul echoes him by commanding believers to “make not provision for the flesh” (Romans 13:14). The reason nobody thinks the binge is changing them is precisely what makes it effective. Desensitization is discipleship in the wrong direction, one episode at a time.

Distraction Is a Weapon

And when direct corruption fails, the enemy has a quieter weapon that works on nearly everyone. In the parable of the sower, Jesus described seed that was not killed by persecution or stolen by the wicked one, but simply choked:

“And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth, and are choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection.” — Luke 8:14 (KJV)

Cares. Riches. Pleasures. Not one of those three is a sin in itself, and that is what makes them so useful. Martha was not sinning when Jesus told her she was “careful and troubled about many things” while Mary had chosen the “one thing” that was needful (Luke 10:41-42). She was busy. She was productive. She was distracted from the Lord sitting in her own house.

John draws the boundary without apology:

“Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” — 1 John 2:15 (KJV)

James goes further still, calling friendship with the world “enmity with God” (James 4:4). The enemy does not need you to worship him. He just needs you too distracted to worship God. An inbox, a feed, a queue of shows, a calendar full of good and urgent things will accomplish that as reliably as any temptation.

The Armor and the Word

Paul did not end Ephesians 6 at the diagnosis. He prescribed the remedy in the verses that follow, and it is worth noticing its shape. The whole armor of God, the girdle of truth, the breastplate of righteousness, the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation, is almost entirely defensive. One weapon is offensive: “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God” (Ephesians 6:17). The believer’s only offensive weapon in this war is Scripture itself, which is exactly why everything that pulls us away from the Word, however entertaining or busy or respectable, is pulling us toward disarmament.

The counter-strategy is not complicated, though it is costly:

“And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” — Romans 12:2 (KJV)

The mind is renewed by what it feeds on. “Thy word have I hid in mine heart,” wrote the psalmist, “that I might not sin against thee” (Psalm 119:11). And James pairs the promise with the command: “Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you” (James 4:7-8). Resistance and nearness to God are not two strategies. They are one.

Paul leaves us with the filter that should govern everything we allow into our minds:

“Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.” — Philippians 4:8 (KJV)

Spiritual wickedness is all around us. That is not a reason for fear. It is a reason for clarity about who the real enemy is, honesty about our own fallen nature, and seriousness about the armor we have been given. Here is a place to start. This week, take one input in your life, one show, one feed, one habit, and hold it up against Philippians 4:8. If it does not survive the comparison, you already know what to do with it.

Evolution just took another hit from the very people trying to prop it up. A University of Michigan team published findings in Nature Ecology & Evolution that should make every honest observer pause. Beneficial mutations turn out to be far more common than the long-revered Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution ever allowed. Yet those same mutations almost never stick around long enough to matter.

Researchers led by evolutionary biologist Jianzhi Zhang examined thousands of amino-acid-changing mutations in yeast and E. coli. More than one percent proved beneficial in at least one environment. That rate is orders of magnitude higher than Motoo Kimura’s neutral theory predicted back in the 1960s. According to the old model, helpful changes were supposed to be vanishingly rare. The data say otherwise.

Subscribe now

Here’s the catch that guts the evolutionary story. Roughly seventy percent of those beneficial mutations turned out to be harmful in a different environment. Scientists call it antagonistic pleiotropy. What helps today can cripple tomorrow. Environments shift. The advantage vanishes. The mutation never reaches fixation across the population. Zhang put it plainly: the outcome looks neutral, but the process is anything but.

Populations end up chasing a moving target. Full adaptation never arrives because the world refuses to stay still long enough. Evolution becomes a restless scramble rather than a steady climb toward greater complexity. One researcher described it as “running after a world that keeps moving.”

Creationists have been saying this for years. Mutations operate on information that already exists. They do not invent the staggering volumes of new, functional genetic code required to turn a bacterium into a butterfly, let alone a human being. Even when a change looks helpful in the lab, it often comes at the cost of lost or degraded function elsewhere.

Antibiotic resistance in bacteria is the classic example. The mutant survives the drug, but it usually grows slower and loses competitive edge the moment the antibiotic disappears.

Dr. Georgia Purdom, molecular geneticist with Answers in Genesis, cut straight to the heart of it. Beneficial mutations may be more common than once claimed, yet they still fail to become fixed because conditions keep changing.

Time does not magically solve the problem. Without a mechanism that actually generates brand-new genetic information, the entire evolutionary narrative collapses into storytelling. Observational science keeps exposing the gap.

The biblical account explains the data without the gymnastics. God created living kinds with complete, functional genetic information from the beginning. The Fall introduced corruption. Mutations degrade what was once “very good.”

They do not build upward. They chip away. That is why we observe variation within kinds and the steady accumulation of genetic load, not the upward march from single cells to civilization.

Scripture leaves no room for doubt on the origin of that information. “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.”

Secular researchers will keep refining their models. They will talk about “adaptive tracking” and “seemingly neutral” outcomes. They will never produce the missing mechanism that turns random chemical accidents into the coded language of life.

Every new study that peels back another layer of the Neutral Theory only makes the problem clearer. The hamster wheel spins. The biblical record stands.

Readers who want the full scientific breakdown can find it reported at Harbinger’s Daily and examined further through the research summaries at Answers in Genesis. The data keep pointing the same direction. The Creator’s design is the only explanation that fits.

A black-and-white sign towers over a California freeway in stark, official-looking type. Four words. Jesus is not God. Thousands of commuters pass it every day, and a great many of them, if they are honest, could not tell you in thirty seconds why it is wrong. That is the actual story here — not the billboard, which is merely rented, but the silence it exposed.

The argument on that vinyl is seventeen centuries old. In the early fourth century a presbyter in Alexandria named Arius taught that the Son was God’s first and greatest creation, exalted above all things but not eternal, not equal, not God. The teaching spread through the Mediterranean world with remarkable speed, split bishops from bishops, and forced the church into the most consequential doctrinal fight in its history. The church answered it at Nicaea in 325. The answer stuck for seventeen hundred years. Now it has been repackaged, purchased, and hung above the 405.

Subscribe now

Who paid for the sign?

The sponsor is an outfit called World’s Last Chance, founded in 2004 and operating largely through a website and a YouTube channel. Christian Post and Faithwire have both traced the campaign to the group, which describes its billboards as four themes meant to shatter long-held misconceptions. Signs have gone up in Southern California, Georgia, and other states. A companion message declares that Jesus did not pre-exist in Heaven.

The group is not a denomination. It is not a church. It is an internet ministry with enough money to buy visual real estate, and its catalog of positions is worth reciting in full, because the billboard is designed to be encountered alone and the rest is designed to be discovered later.

World’s Last Chance rejects the Trinity. It teaches a lunisolar calendar for determining the Sabbath. It refuses the English name Jesus in favor of Yahushua and calls the Father Yahuwah. It adds law-keeping as a requirement for righteousness. And, per CBN, it teaches that the earth is flat.

An organization that cannot correctly identify the shape of the planet has purchased the authority to instruct Californians on the nature of the Godhead. The sign works precisely because it does not mention the calendar or the flat earth. It offers no argument at all. It is a provocation dressed as a conclusion, and it is aimed at people who have never been given the tools to answer it.

The answer the church already wrote down

John opens his Gospel by declaring that the Word was with God and the Word was God, and then closes the loop fourteen verses later by saying that the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. Christ tells the Pharisees that before Abraham was, I am — a construction so unmistakable that his listeners immediately reached for stones. Thomas, confronted with the wounds, says my Lord and my God, and receives no correction. Paul writes to the Colossians that in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

None of this is obscure. None of it requires Greek, a seminary degree, or a commentary. It requires that someone, at some point, taught it to you and expected you to remember. That is the part American churches quietly stopped doing somewhere between the seeker-sensitive revolution and the sermon series on financial peace. We traded catechesis for relevance and then acted surprised when a fringe sect with a printing budget could rattle the pews.

The paint roller and the better answer

In late January a video went viral showing an unidentified man standing on a billboard catwalk with the Los Angeles skyline behind him, methodically painting out the word not. The internet loved it. Someone coined the word evandalism. Living Waters founder Ray Comfort weighed in with a warning about the group, noting that “whoever denies the Son does not have the Father.”

The instinct was right. The method was not. That billboard was legally purchased from a company that owns the structure, and painting it out is vandalism whatever the motive. Conservatives spent the better part of a decade watching statues toppled and storefronts smashed by people who were certain their cause justified the damage. We do not get to keep the principle only when the paint is running our direction. A faith that requires a ladder and a paint can to make its case has already conceded the argument it claims to be winning.

The better response was already happening, and almost nobody covered it. ChurchLeaders collected reader accounts of congregations and businesses answering the signs the way free people are supposed to answer speech they find false — by buying their own.

One reader described a California church that raised the money for a counter-billboard directly across from the original, pointing to a website with the full gospel. Another said a local electrical company in Lynchburg, Virginia put up its own sign reading that Jesus is God, complete with three chapter-and-verse citations. The reader added the detail that stings. None of the large churches paid for it. A private utility contractor did.

Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Contend. Not deface. The word carries the sense of an argument pressed with everything you have, in public, against people who will push back. It assumes you know the material. It assumes you can open the book and show a stranger on a freeway offramp why the sign above his head is lying to him. Arius lost that argument in 325 because men who had memorized the text refused to yield an inch of it.

The billboards will come down when the contracts expire. The question worth sitting with is what happens the next time a fringe outfit with a few thousand dollars decides to test whether the American church still remembers what it believes — and whether, next time, anyone will have to climb a ladder at all.

In the winter of 1991, as coalition forces massed against Iraqi aggression in Kuwait, one of the most brutal dictators of the modern era made a decision that defied every strategic calculation. Saddam Hussein, master of human shields and regional terror, abruptly ordered the release of Western hostages.

Among those freed was a missionary father whose family had endured weeks of captivity. The move baffled diplomats, military planners, and even President George H.W. Bush. There was no rational explanation—until you consider the hand of the living God.

Aaron Graham, who was just ten years old when his family was taken hostage in Kuwait, later learned the details. As churches worldwide mobilized in fervent prayer, Saddam began experiencing troubling dreams so intense they robbed him of sleep.

He reportedly confessed that God was troubling his spirit. Shortly after, the hostages walked free. What secular analysts still cannot explain, believers recognize as divine intervention. Prayer moved the heart of a tyrant, proving once again that the Almighty is sovereign over kings and kingdoms alike.

Subscribe now

This episode is no mere historical curiosity. It stands as a powerful rebuke to the sterile rationalism that has infected even parts of the church. In an age obsessed with data, psychology, and human agency, we are tempted to reduce faith to moral lessons and social programs. Yet Scripture and history alike declare that Christianity is irreducibly supernatural.

The God who troubled Pharaoh’s dreams and hardened his heart is the same God who can stir the conscience of a modern despot.

Consider the broader pattern. Across the Middle East, reports continue of Muslims encountering Jesus in dreams and visions—encounters that open hearts otherwise closed by fear and tradition. These are not isolated anomalies but echoes of a God who refuses to be confined by our expectations or limited by geopolitical realities.

The same divine power that parted the Red Sea and raised Christ from the dead still operates today, often in the most unlikely places.

Graham’s personal testimony highlights a tension many evangelicals feel. Raised in a tradition strong on biblical truth but cautious about the Holy Spirit’s present-day activity, he yearns for the full expression of New Testament Christianity. Jesus Himself promised that His followers would do the works He did—and greater works—through the power of the Spirit.

This is not fringe charismatic excess but the plain teaching of Scripture. To deny the supernatural dimension is to embrace a form of godliness while denying its power.

The early church understood this. The apostles did not conquer the Roman Empire through superior arguments alone, though they were not lacking in intellect. Their message came with demonstration of the Spirit and power. Paul wrote that his preaching was not in persuasive words of human wisdom but in the convincing proof of divine reality. That same power is available to every believer surrendered to Christ’s lordship.

Yet in our sophisticated age, many believers hesitate. They fear looking foolish or unscientific. They settle for a faith that looks suspiciously like self-help with Bible verses. This is spiritual malpractice. The mission Christ gave His church—to make disciples of all nations—requires nothing less than the fullness of the Holy Spirit. Service gifts matter, but so do the manifestation gifts that display God’s direct intervention: healing, prophecy, discernment, and faith that moves mountains.

Walking in the Spirit does not mean abandoning reason. It means recognizing that reason has limits. Faith is beyond reason without being against it. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is historically attested, yet it transcends natural explanation. It stands as the ultimate vindication that God’s ways are higher than our ways. When we limit God to what our minds can comfortably contain, we rob ourselves of the wonder and power He intends for His people.

The lesson from Saddam’s dreams extends beyond one family’s deliverance. It challenges us to examine our own lives. Have we reduced the Holy Spirit to a theological abstraction, or do we know Him as the living presence who awakens our hearts daily to Christ? Do we eagerly desire the gifts He gives, not for personal spectacle but for the building up of the church and the advancement of the kingdom?

These questions are not peripheral. They determine whether our Christianity will be a dim reflection of cultural Christianity or a vibrant force that shakes the gates of hell.

In a world growing darker, with secular powers arrayed against biblical truth, the church cannot afford a powerless gospel. We need believers who pray with expectation, serve with supernatural enablement, and testify to a God who still does the impossible. The same God who troubled a dictator’s sleep in response to the prayers of His people stands ready to move again—if we will ask.

“And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams.” This promise from Joel, fulfilled at Pentecost, continues until Christ returns. The outpouring has not ceased. The question is whether we will position ourselves to receive it.

Let the story of one family’s rescue through divine disruption renew our confidence. God is not distant. He is actively involved in human history, responding to the cries of His people. In an era of skepticism and spiritual warfare, may we embrace the full supernatural reality of our faith. The mission is too great, the hour too late, and the King too glorious for anything less.

In Jones County, Mississippi, Pastor Matt Olson of First Baptist Church of Sharon stood in the pulpit and delivered the full counsel of God from Genesis to Revelation over four straight days. For 96 hours, with minimal breaks, he proclaimed Scripture without ceasing, setting an unofficial world record for the longest marathon sermon. His closing declaration rang out clearly: “Jesus is worthy.”

https://twitter.com/Protestia/status/2067178184710537393

The congregation rose in a standing ovation, moved by the endurance and the message.

This was no stunt for headlines or personal glory. Olson’s feat grew from a profound personal encounter during missionary training in hostile environments the previous year. Left in the woods for 96 hours without a physical Bible, he relied solely on what he had stored in his heart. The hunger for God’s Word that followed became the catalyst for this remarkable effort.

Olson and his team followed Guinness World Record guidelines for the attempt but deliberately chose not to pursue official certification. They viewed submitting the Bible itself as a publicity gimmick and declined the steep $16,500 fee for an adjudicator, believing those resources better spent elsewhere in kingdom work. The focus remained on exalting Christ and feeding the flock with unadulterated truth.

Video clips captured the journey. Olson’s voice started strong, grew strained after the first day, yet held firm to the end. Medical observers noted it even strengthened as the marathon concluded. Church members supported him with prayer, encouragement, and practical care, turning the event into a communal act of devotion.

The pastor’s love for preaching flows from his calling. According to his church’s site, his greatest joy lies in teaching the Word of God. This marathon embodied that passion, demonstrating Scripture’s power to sustain a man physically, spiritually, and vocally when human strength alone would fail.

Olson reflected afterward on the experience: “The Word of God is truth… and it is sufficient. It is what sustained me for 96 hours when, physically, I should not have continued to… no one should be able to do that.”

He emphasized that every sentence preached pointed to Jesus as Lord, worthy of every sacrifice and act of obedience.

Observers drew parallels to George Whitefield, the great evangelist of the Great Awakening, who preached tirelessly across colonial America, sometimes delivering sermons that left him physically spent yet ignited revival fires. Olson’s effort echoes that same unyielding commitment to heralding the gospel amid a culture increasingly starved for truth.

In an age of short attention spans, soundbites, and superficial spirituality, this Mississippi pastor’s endurance stands as a living rebuke. It challenges believers to consider how deeply they treasure the Bible. How many of us could rely on memorized Scripture for days without a copy in hand? Olson’s story reminds us that the Word is no mere book but living sustenance for those who hide it in their hearts.

His closing words captured the heart of the matter: “Jesus is Lord. He is worthy of every sentence I preached, every sacrifice that was made, and every step of obedience that has been taken since.”

And the people said amen.

“Jesus is worthy.”

As the apostle Paul charged Timothy, “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season” (2 Timothy 4:2).

In a world drowning in distractions and deception, Pastor Olson’s marathon preaching offers a powerful picture of faithfulness. May it stir many more to love the Scriptures, proclaim them boldly, and declare with fresh conviction that Jesus Christ is indeed worthy.

Across pews once dominated by gray heads and empty seats, a new presence is emerging: young men in their twenties, showing up with purpose. This is no fleeting trend or social media mirage. Data from Gallup and Barna confirm what observant Christians have sensed in their congregations — a resurgence of faith among males who, just years ago, seemed lost to secular distractions and cultural confusion.

This shift matters profoundly. For decades, the left’s relentless push toward relativism, identity politics, and self-worship has hollowed out institutions, families, and individual lives. Young men, bearing the brunt of a society that demonized masculinity while celebrating chaos, are discovering what their fathers and grandfathers often took for granted: true strength flows from surrender to a higher calling.

Gallup’s latest findings reveal that 42 percent of young men now consider religion “very important” in their lives — a 14-point jump since 2023 and the highest level in a quarter century. Barna Group reports Gen Z churchgoers attending more frequently than any other generation, marking what they call a “historic reversal.”

Young men are not just warming pews; they are leading the return.

Sociologists scratch their heads at this development, but the reasons are clear to anyone willing to look beyond progressive talking points. The past decade exposed the emptiness of self-expression without boundaries, of activism untethered from truth, and of technology promising connection while delivering isolation. Like rebels of previous eras who chased liberation only to find chains, today’s young men have encountered the void at the heart of modern secularism.

Dr. William J. Bennett, reflecting on his own journey from a secular college detour back to Catholic faith, captures the dynamic well. The “chains” of religion, he notes, prove liberating. Faith communities demand better — purpose forged in struggle, sacrifice, and service to something eternal.

This resonates deeply with young men wired for adventure, responsibility, and meaning beyond fleeting pleasures or online outrage.

Subscribe now

The Cultural and Political Stakes

A generation recovering the transcendent will not bow easily to the state as ultimate authority. History bears this out. America’s founding drew strength from biblical principles and men of faith who understood liberty as a divine trust, not a government grant.

When young men embrace this inheritance, they become bulwarks against family erosion, educational indoctrination, and the erosion of religious liberty.

Evidence already points to ripple effects. Post-assassination of Charlie Kirk last September, Bible sales surged 36 percent in a month, reaching 21-year highs in 2025. Young people confronted with mortality and meaningless rage turned to the only source that has ever answered such questions adequately. This is not coincidence; it is providence at work amid gathering storms — from gender ideology’s confusion to democratic socialism’s false promises and AI’s godless horizons.

Strong male participation in the church strengthens the entire body. When men lead spiritually in homes and congregations, marriages stabilize, children flourish, and communities gain moral backbone. Research consistently shows religiously engaged men exhibit lower rates of destructive behaviors, higher commitment to family, and greater civic involvement. In an age of fatherlessness and aimlessness, this return signals hope for reversing national decline.

Critics on the left dismiss or downplay these trends, perhaps sensing the threat to their narrative of inevitable secular progress. Yet the data keeps mounting, even as some attempt to attribute shifts solely to women’s declining participation rather than men’s revival. The reality in the pews tells otherwise: young men are showing up, engaging, and seeking truth amid the lies.

A Call to Greater Faithfulness

This resurgence invites the broader church to respond with vigor — not watered-down relevance, but uncompromised proclamation of the Gospel that has always transformed lives and societies. Pastors and leaders must disciple these young men into mature believers ready to build families, defend truth, and engage culture without apology.

The pattern echoes biblical precedent. When darkness deepens, light breaks through with greater brilliance. As the prophet declared in days of national crisis, “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” (2 Chronicles 7:14)

Young men answering this call today stand poised not merely to match the faithfulness of prior generations but to surpass it. Their hunger for purpose, forged in cultural fire, positions them as instruments for renewal. America does not need more programs or policies divorced from virtue; it needs hearts reclaimed by the God who designed men for leadership, protection, and sacrificial love.

The future remains unwritten, but the signs in the sanctuary point toward restoration. As these young men take their place, the reshaping of families, culture, and the nation itself may well follow. The question is whether the church and country will rise to meet this moment with the same resolve they are rediscovering.

We pray “Give us this day our daily bread” so often that we stop hearing it. But Jesus chose every word, and the words are pointed. He did not teach us to ask for a surplus, a savings buffer, or security against the unknown. He taught us to ask for today — and only today.

The Greek makes the point sharper than English can carry it. The word rendered “daily” is *epiousios*, a word found nowhere else in all of Greek literature. The Gospel writers appear to have minted it, deliberately passing over the ordinary word for “daily.”

The backdrop is the manna of Exodus 16 — bread that fell fresh each morning and could not be kept: “some of them left of it until the morning, and it bred worms, and stank” (Exodus 16:20). God fed His people abundantly and made the abundance impossible to stockpile. The dependence was the point.

So the petition is quietly subversive. We are wired to build barns — to secure ourselves against tomorrow, next year, old age, collapse. Jesus answers that instinct a few verses later: “Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself” (Matthew 6:34).

This is not a sermon against work or savings. It is a relocation of trust. Our security was never meant to sit in the storehouse but in the One who refills it each morning.

Then the prayer turns outward. “And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors” (Matthew 6:12). Notice it is never prayed alone — *us, our, we,* from the first word. We are not customers placing an order with heaven; we are stewards asking to be fed so we can feed, forgiven so we can forgive.

It is the one petition Jesus stops to explain: “For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6:14). The bread we receive and the mercy we extend are the same daily act of open-handed dependence — never a clenched fist.

Maybe that is why it has to be prayed daily. Yesterday’s bread is already gone, and yesterday’s grudge has no business surviving the night.